Skip to main content

Dispelling Error

My Response to anti-Duke sentiment everywhere.

I must admit it openly, I am a Duke fan, and it is full-blown. I can't help; I was born that way. I am not one who hops on bandwagons, for I do remember all to well the year Duke didn't make the NCAA tourney (i guess it was only one year). My point today is to give light to a few erroneous assertions.

(1) You should hate Duke because Coach K is a foul-mouthed man. Might I first of all point out, if you are looking a great coach with 'Christian character'...well, good luck. If you hate Duke because of Coach K's vulgarity, your reasoning is in error.

(2) You should hate Duke because they are shown on TV too much. I don't think I remember too many Carolina games not being shown. By the way, Duke does happen to be one of the most popular teams in the country (as far as fans in every state). Coaches do tell their players, watch Duke, they do this well. My coach said this, and he is staunch UNC-only. Perenially good teams get good network coverage. This has generally been the case in sports. You don't watch golf to see number 125 on the money list do you?

(3) You should hate Duke because JJ Redick is way over-hyped. Yes I have heard this. To this statement I reply, "Are you kidding me?" I remember watching announcers praise the way Michael Jordan would drink his gatorade. People typically didn't hate MJ or the Bulls. Announcers point out every missed free-throw JJ misses. They question his defense. If over hyping means being overly critical about minute details, well, I guess I concede. After all, JJ has scored 40 twice this year...on the road... against teams that will be high seeds in the tournament. He will wind up being the ALL-TIME leader in the NCAA in 3-pointers made. He will be the ALL-TIME leading scorer at Duke. That's elite company people.

(4) You should hate Duke because Coach K controls the referees. First of all, I am a referee. I can tell you, referees of that caliber do their job well. Secondly, when a coach is right about a bad call you make, and he happens to be in the Hall of Fame, you tend to listen. That's not unfair. That's life. I would also like to know the last quality coach who made an assertion like this. I mean, of course every opposing fan in the building thinks this way. So, you mean to tell me you are going to listen to bias fans argue that the officiating is bad.

(5) You should hate Duke because many a fan base has copied the Cameron Crazies. Oh wait, that one wasn't supposed to get out. I guess imitation is the highest form of flattery.

(6) You should hate Duke because they always win. Well, you'll just have to get over it. Some things just don't change!

***This document is a partial requirement of a Duke fan's response to anti-Duke sentiment based in Chapel Hill, NC.***

Popular posts from this blog

USA v. Ghana: Line-up & Prediction

This is the most interesting game of the tournament as far as what is at stake. The USA need a win by at least 3 goals if the Czech and Italians were to tie. If Italy were to beat the Czech, all the USA would need is a win. Here is my "best-bet" line-up: GK - Keller D - Bocanegra, Gooch (yc), Cherundolo MF - Beasley, Reyna (yc), Dempsey, O'Brien, Donovan F - McBride, E. Johnson Notes: - 3 in the back will force play outside; Dempsey (RWM) and Beasley (LWM) are fast enough to play both ways - Midfield control will be the most crucial factor to a multi-goal win. We will not counter-attack well with the speed of the Ghana side. Also, if we don't control the midfield, Michael Essien will. - I think McBride and Johnson are the best bet up front. McBride receives the ball well. Johnson's size, quickness, and skill will serve us well. - A big question is who will play Def. MF. With no Mastroeni, we resort to either Dempsey or O'Brien in a 3-5-2 formation. SUBS: - Con...

Favre Talking Points

I was a closet Green Bay fan in high school, mainly because of some big-time Packer fans in my church. Granted, it was easy to pull for them, since they weren't rivals with America's Team -- that's right! What intrigues me the most is that three teams took different approaches to Brett Favre, and I believe they would've have been mistaken to respond differently. Packers were criticized (as was Favre) for not letting Favre come back. I'm sure there are still some detractors that would say Favre would've won more games than Rodgers (6). What's interesting is that Aaron Rodgers QB stats (other than wins) were better than Favre's. The point is that, the Packers weren't going to win the NFC last season, with or without #4. They could be a Super Bowl team in 2-3 years. The Packers made a great move by parting with Favre. It couldn't have happened better for them. Jets are a bit more troublesome to parse apart. The only thing that makes them look foolis...

Don't be 'Joe Fan'

The response from Wednesday's USA last minute thriller versus Algeria felt like the crest of a crescendo that had been swelling since 2000 or so, or maybe even 1996 at the outset of MLS. My favorite US Soccer fan type is 'Joe Fan' who only watches soccer for 1 month out of every four years. He knows general soccer lingo. He even knows the favorites to win the tournament. None of these, though, is his calling card. You'll know Joe Fan by this very one thing -- as the World Cup is discussed among him, he'll whip out his anti-USA soccer spiel that he's been working on all week, or worse -- the one he heard from Michael Wilbon on PTI the previous afternoon. Most Joe Fan-types have these things in common: They think soccer is boring because there isn't much scoring. Soccer isn't even as big as hockey in the US, so it must not matter much. He thinks that since the USA isn't a top 10 favorite to win the World Cup, they must not be any good. He sees the USA ...