Skip to main content

Comments regarding "Age of Opportunity"

In another week or so, I am set to begin a 3-week block class entitled, "Philosophy of Youth Ministry." When I saw the books to be used, I was excited. The first was, "Age of Opportunity" by Tripp. I had heard of the book and I am pretty sure my church has used it in a parenting class. But I had never read it.

So, I am through the first chapter now. If the rest of the book builds on that, (and I suspect it will) it will be a great read.

Through other reads (Scripture and other books), as well as talks with pastors and youth workers, I have become increasingly aware that our confessional theology and our practical theology are incongruous when it comes to dealing with teens. In other words, what we would say we believe does not align with what we actually believe, which is revealed by what we practice.

Tripp says in his book (chapter 1, obviously) that most (probably 99.9%) parents see child-raising as a survival contest. Tripp consistently argues that the teen years are minimally an "Age of Opportunity." (hence the title) For anyone who ever reads this, filter the typical comments that you hear/have heard from parents into this analysis. Having analyzed them, would you say parents (or churches for that matter) see teenage years in 'opportunity mode' or 'survival mode'?

Back to my thesis of incongruous theologies, we preach (I hope at least...) a limitless Gospel. We would agree that the Gospel is the only way a person is changed, yet in our practice we show that we are really practical unbelievers, because we primarily concern ourselves with persuading our teens to adopt an external Gospel, where they are viewed as 'ok' because they can look, talk like, and act like 'Christian school kids.'

I love Tripp's focus on the Gospel in the opening chapter. On page 24, he states: "This time provided many opportunities for listening, love, encouragement, and the Gospel."

He discusses in some length the 'cultural cynicism' that Christian parents have adopted. (By the way, this is a quintessential example of what Paul means when he says in Romans 12:1-2 "Don't be conformed to the world, but (all of you) be transformed by the renenwing of your mind." To see the teen years as an 'aggrevation' or an 'incovenience' or even a 'survivial period' is to adopt the very attitude of people who hate the Gospel of Jesus Christ. We must REJECT this model.

As a sort of antidote to this worldly epidemic, Tripp states:
"If we are to be his instruments, we must deal with our own idolatry and bring a robust, Biblical faith to each rocky moment , a faith that believes that God rules over all things for our sake, that He is an ever-present help in trouble, that He is at work in every situation accomplishing His redemptive purpose, and that His Word is powerful, active, and effective." (Tripp 27)

We show what we believe when we wake up each morning. With every frustrating situation that presses us, we reveal whether we actually believe what we confess to believe. Instead of "surviving," we must be transformed by having our minds renewed by the Gospel.

Popular posts from this blog

No Zion, No Problem? Not So Fast.

Everyone in the media has wanted their piece of the pie with Zion this year. Each highlight reel dunk and spectacular block has only increased the media fervor and number of followers. As Duke looks to face Syracuse, and presumably Virginia Tech as well, without Zion, let's consider what Duke looks like without Zion, and what it must do against Syracuse to leave the Carrier Dome with a W. DUKE WITHOUT ZION Duke without Zion is not a cart without a horse. But it might be a sports car without its turbo. Or maybe a chef without her secret sauce. Here are the main points to consider: MAIN POINTS - A Five Spot 1. Without Zion, Duke can’t play “position-less basketball” since all bench players have limitations. Not only is Zion our best two-way player (offense and defense), but he also allows the greatest roster flexibility in terms of building around him. He wreaks havoc wherever he is on the floor. We don't have another player like that, certainly not from the bench

Processing US Women's World Cup Final loss

Without a doubt, this year's Women's World Cup was the most entertaining (on this side of the pond, as they say) since the 1999 edition of the global tournament. The USA's performance and "never say die" attitude endeared this team to many American fans rather quickly, which was no more apparent than when the team stormed back to tie Brasil in 120+ minute, before going to win in penalties. Unfortunately, the dream ended in penalty kicks to a resilient Japanese side who was more fit for the task. Here's my attempt to process and set expectations on yesterday's US loss: 1. The best team doesn't always win in soccer. Sometimes, even the most dominant team in a particular game doesn't win that game. (HT: Grant Wahl , Sports Illustrated) 2. Here are some notes on penalties ending this game: (a) Tough on USA, since Japan had data on US shooters, since they had just seen them against Brasil. There are players that take their penalties the same direction

BCS Postseason Analysis

If the controversy surrounding the BCS System and college football bowl format, it certainly is the most complex and misunderstood controversy. The morning after the BCS championship game, here are three talking points: 1 - We're closer than ever to seeing a change in the traditional bowl format. The 2011 bowl season again proved how difficult it is to sell out every bowl game. This usually results in the participating schools having to eat the cost of those tickets. That trend can't continue. Playing in a meaningless bowl game actually costs some schools more money than they make by participating in the game. You can read about one instance of this happening here , involving the 2011 Virginia Tech football team, which made it to the Orange Bowl. The school had to eat 9,500 tickets it couldn't sell. They lost a total of $421,000, and it could've been a lot worse. 2 - The BCS isn't the enemy of the playoff system. In fact, they could actually be really good friends