Skip to main content

Comments regarding "Age of Opportunity"

In another week or so, I am set to begin a 3-week block class entitled, "Philosophy of Youth Ministry." When I saw the books to be used, I was excited. The first was, "Age of Opportunity" by Tripp. I had heard of the book and I am pretty sure my church has used it in a parenting class. But I had never read it.

So, I am through the first chapter now. If the rest of the book builds on that, (and I suspect it will) it will be a great read.

Through other reads (Scripture and other books), as well as talks with pastors and youth workers, I have become increasingly aware that our confessional theology and our practical theology are incongruous when it comes to dealing with teens. In other words, what we would say we believe does not align with what we actually believe, which is revealed by what we practice.

Tripp says in his book (chapter 1, obviously) that most (probably 99.9%) parents see child-raising as a survival contest. Tripp consistently argues that the teen years are minimally an "Age of Opportunity." (hence the title) For anyone who ever reads this, filter the typical comments that you hear/have heard from parents into this analysis. Having analyzed them, would you say parents (or churches for that matter) see teenage years in 'opportunity mode' or 'survival mode'?

Back to my thesis of incongruous theologies, we preach (I hope at least...) a limitless Gospel. We would agree that the Gospel is the only way a person is changed, yet in our practice we show that we are really practical unbelievers, because we primarily concern ourselves with persuading our teens to adopt an external Gospel, where they are viewed as 'ok' because they can look, talk like, and act like 'Christian school kids.'

I love Tripp's focus on the Gospel in the opening chapter. On page 24, he states: "This time provided many opportunities for listening, love, encouragement, and the Gospel."

He discusses in some length the 'cultural cynicism' that Christian parents have adopted. (By the way, this is a quintessential example of what Paul means when he says in Romans 12:1-2 "Don't be conformed to the world, but (all of you) be transformed by the renenwing of your mind." To see the teen years as an 'aggrevation' or an 'incovenience' or even a 'survivial period' is to adopt the very attitude of people who hate the Gospel of Jesus Christ. We must REJECT this model.

As a sort of antidote to this worldly epidemic, Tripp states:
"If we are to be his instruments, we must deal with our own idolatry and bring a robust, Biblical faith to each rocky moment , a faith that believes that God rules over all things for our sake, that He is an ever-present help in trouble, that He is at work in every situation accomplishing His redemptive purpose, and that His Word is powerful, active, and effective." (Tripp 27)

We show what we believe when we wake up each morning. With every frustrating situation that presses us, we reveal whether we actually believe what we confess to believe. Instead of "surviving," we must be transformed by having our minds renewed by the Gospel.

Popular posts from this blog

SportsDesk - 06.25.09

It's official. Shaq is a Cleveland Cavalier. Let the Cleveland nickname offerings begin! Here are some thoughts to consider with this move: The NBA East has officially become as interesting and exciting as the West. The Magic, Cavs, Celtics, Heat and Sixers are as fun to watch as the Lakers, Nuggets, Blazers, Mavs, and Hornets. This trade is the last straw for Cleveland to land LeBron in Summer 2010. If the Cavs don't win the title, LBJ will become a NY Knick next Summer. It's a done deal. The Shaq acquisition doesn't solve any long-term problems for Cleveland. He'll be there one year. Shaq doesn't have 3 years of productivity left. If he wins a title next year, he should retire a champion. I don't see Cleveland giving him a 2-year contract at the end of next season. If LBJ and Shaq "leave" Cleveland next summer, which big free agent star comes to Cleveland in the wake of LBJ? I don't see Wade doing it. Bosh doesn't fit the mold. If Clevel...

No Zion, No Problem? Not So Fast.

Everyone in the media has wanted their piece of the pie with Zion this year. Each highlight reel dunk and spectacular block has only increased the media fervor and number of followers. As Duke looks to face Syracuse, and presumably Virginia Tech as well, without Zion, let's consider what Duke looks like without Zion, and what it must do against Syracuse to leave the Carrier Dome with a W. DUKE WITHOUT ZION Duke without Zion is not a cart without a horse. But it might be a sports car without its turbo. Or maybe a chef without her secret sauce. Here are the main points to consider: MAIN POINTS - A Five Spot 1. Without Zion, Duke can’t play “position-less basketball” since all bench players have limitations. Not only is Zion our best two-way player (offense and defense), but he also allows the greatest roster flexibility in terms of building around him. He wreaks havoc wherever he is on the floor. We don't have another player like that, certainly not from the bench...

Favre Talking Points

I was a closet Green Bay fan in high school, mainly because of some big-time Packer fans in my church. Granted, it was easy to pull for them, since they weren't rivals with America's Team -- that's right! What intrigues me the most is that three teams took different approaches to Brett Favre, and I believe they would've have been mistaken to respond differently. Packers were criticized (as was Favre) for not letting Favre come back. I'm sure there are still some detractors that would say Favre would've won more games than Rodgers (6). What's interesting is that Aaron Rodgers QB stats (other than wins) were better than Favre's. The point is that, the Packers weren't going to win the NFC last season, with or without #4. They could be a Super Bowl team in 2-3 years. The Packers made a great move by parting with Favre. It couldn't have happened better for them. Jets are a bit more troublesome to parse apart. The only thing that makes them look foolis...