Skip to main content

linchpins for Success at World Cup

The USA is currently ranked 4th in the FIFA standings (that's world, people), the highest ranking ever for the States. That's cool and possibly a keeper stat, but it's not as telling as much as would be imagined or desired. Brazil, at number 1, is in a world of their own. It will take a monumental effort on the opponent's part to dethrone the soccer titans of the world. Country's ranked between 2-10 are basically the same caliber. This should not discourage however. The US team is finally as good as, if not better than the England side(a personal wish of mine would be a 2-0 win against England's starting XI), Portugal, Spain, and maybe even Italy and the Czech, which happen to be our group stage opponents. Drumroll please...the linchpins for success for the US team this summer in Germany are as follows: (i'll try to avoid the absolute obvious elements)
  1. No more injuries!!! We are not terribly deep when it comes to world-class talent. Truthfully, world-class talent may not even characterize every starter we have. An injury to the likes of Donovan, Beasley, or Reyna could spell disaster, which being interpreted is "not getting out of the group stage"
  2. No own goals!!! (This is a flashback from the '02 Cup when Jeff Agoos (bless his heart) netted one for the other team against Portugal, nearly costing us 3 vital points against a world power. ) I don't see the US team scoring 3+ goals against either Italy or the Czech, so an own goal would prove costly.
  3. Avoiding extraneous lineup adjustments. The best starting XI should play every match with only a switch or two depending upon the opponent (maybe). In 2002, Arena used several different starting lineups, which I honestly believe disrupts flow and consistency, at best. To his credit, Arena has almost too much talent sitting on the bench. There are guys that can contribute. But it's Arena's job to play the best, and to make only those subs which are vital.
  4. A dominant Central Midfield. Guys like Ballack, Ronaldinho, etc. can totally change the match with their 5-star play. We will see how well our defensive unit fares against the world best.
  5. Set-piece goals. The US undoubtedly have some of the largest defenders in the Cup. Onyewu is HUGE. Between him, Bocanegra, McBride, we should have several goals off restarts. Most times, not enough priority is placed on set pieces. I would venture to say that behind Germany, and maybe another country (just room for mistake), the US is as good as they come in the air.
  6. Finally, some good bounces. I'm not a believer in fate, nor am I a fatalist, but sometimes you just gotta get the bounces. We'll see. It should be a good Cup.
All this comes from a soccer player, referree, self-proclaimed analyst, and fan. These views may not necessarily be objective or fair by nature. But I do issue a promise, I will not be like some (Billy Packer, Eric Wynalda) who rub their "points of importance" in others' faces. (sorry, just a pet pieve).

May good futbol result from training in Cary, NC and crescendo in Germany! Go USA!!!

Popular posts from this blog

SportsDesk - 06.25.09

It's official. Shaq is a Cleveland Cavalier. Let the Cleveland nickname offerings begin! Here are some thoughts to consider with this move: The NBA East has officially become as interesting and exciting as the West. The Magic, Cavs, Celtics, Heat and Sixers are as fun to watch as the Lakers, Nuggets, Blazers, Mavs, and Hornets. This trade is the last straw for Cleveland to land LeBron in Summer 2010. If the Cavs don't win the title, LBJ will become a NY Knick next Summer. It's a done deal. The Shaq acquisition doesn't solve any long-term problems for Cleveland. He'll be there one year. Shaq doesn't have 3 years of productivity left. If he wins a title next year, he should retire a champion. I don't see Cleveland giving him a 2-year contract at the end of next season. If LBJ and Shaq "leave" Cleveland next summer, which big free agent star comes to Cleveland in the wake of LBJ? I don't see Wade doing it. Bosh doesn't fit the mold. If Clevel...

No Zion, No Problem? Not So Fast.

Everyone in the media has wanted their piece of the pie with Zion this year. Each highlight reel dunk and spectacular block has only increased the media fervor and number of followers. As Duke looks to face Syracuse, and presumably Virginia Tech as well, without Zion, let's consider what Duke looks like without Zion, and what it must do against Syracuse to leave the Carrier Dome with a W. DUKE WITHOUT ZION Duke without Zion is not a cart without a horse. But it might be a sports car without its turbo. Or maybe a chef without her secret sauce. Here are the main points to consider: MAIN POINTS - A Five Spot 1. Without Zion, Duke can’t play “position-less basketball” since all bench players have limitations. Not only is Zion our best two-way player (offense and defense), but he also allows the greatest roster flexibility in terms of building around him. He wreaks havoc wherever he is on the floor. We don't have another player like that, certainly not from the bench...

Favre Talking Points

I was a closet Green Bay fan in high school, mainly because of some big-time Packer fans in my church. Granted, it was easy to pull for them, since they weren't rivals with America's Team -- that's right! What intrigues me the most is that three teams took different approaches to Brett Favre, and I believe they would've have been mistaken to respond differently. Packers were criticized (as was Favre) for not letting Favre come back. I'm sure there are still some detractors that would say Favre would've won more games than Rodgers (6). What's interesting is that Aaron Rodgers QB stats (other than wins) were better than Favre's. The point is that, the Packers weren't going to win the NFC last season, with or without #4. They could be a Super Bowl team in 2-3 years. The Packers made a great move by parting with Favre. It couldn't have happened better for them. Jets are a bit more troublesome to parse apart. The only thing that makes them look foolis...